Sign In
PUBLIC RELATIONS
Tuesday 15th March 2022

Why PR Needs More Than Sentiment Analysis on Social Media

Anthony Cousins, CEO of Factmata

The use of social media has grown exponentially over the years. In 2020, Statista reported almost half (49%) of the world uses social media. Other figures show TikTok alone gains eight new users every second. The number of people using social media in their everyday lives is what makes it popular with its users as well as with brands looking to understand consumer awareness, engagement and sentiment.

However, with social media growth comes more information to analyse, monitor and measure. According to the IDC data creation and replication will grow at a faster rate than storage capacity. Not only will data storage become an issue, but data analysis already is an issue. Analysing significant volumes of new daily content, especially messy unstructured text like social media, has made media monitoring for public relations teams inefficient and unsustainable as noted in Making Sense of Mass Mentions. We need an effective and scalable solution.

PR problems

Making matters worse, we now live in the age of ‘cancel culture’ and boycotts from a passionate and confident generation, where missing one negative opinion could lead to thousands. In 2021, 80% of people would boycott a brand based on widespread, negative information they see online, regardless of the facts. Reputations are on the line, and brands are under more scrutiny than ever.
In these circumstances, quickly and effectively identifying a change in tone and sentiment can be the difference between a win and a crisis. Deloitte found one in four people moved away from brands that they believed acted in self-interest, meaning PR teams have to work even harder to monitor and manage brand sentiment online and also judge their responses carefully.
Authenticity to a brand’s established values is the golden ticket for building trust. But what about issues that are truly new to a brand and where there is no established ‘position’. For example, the conflict in Ukraine, how much do a given brand’s audience care and what do they expect the brand to do, if anything? The speed at which user-generated content is being created is proving challenging for teams to keep up with, where every second counts if a response is going to be effective.
Media monitoring is missing the mark
Traditional methods of media monitoring and social media listening aren’t fit for purpose.
The standard use of machine learning in such services is the use of ‘sentiment analysis’. These algorithms analyse the words people use to share their opinions to determine if they’re positive, negative or neutral, but these models don’t understand context. They can’t tell whether people are using positive language to describe negative outcomes, or vice versa. We all know sentiment analysis has its flaws yet, without any alternatives, the industry has become desensitised to its failings.
Context is king. Take our Ukrainian example. Almost every opinion shared on the topic will score negatively for sentiment, so how is a PR team supposed to analyse the huge volume of content to determine how any specific brand should act and whether that action, or inaction, has made any impact on the brand’s reputation? With simple sentiment analysis PR teams are unable to determine the real intent behind tweets, posts and conversations, leaving PR teams with a mountain of data and no effective way to analyse it.

Stance is superior
New AI models for automatically identifying the specific trending narratives around brands enable millions of comments to be analysed in seconds. These narratives can then be measured for their sentiment within context, enabling much more accurate and actionable insights for PR teams.
The latest research in natural language processing has made these ‘stance’ models more sophisticated, enabling brands to understand the true meaning behind audience conversations.
Stance models can identify the subject of an opinion and the lexical cues that indicate a positive or negative stance towards any given topic. Analysing stance over sentiment means PR teams can now identify specific influencers that are ‘for’ or ‘against’ a brand or topic as well as whether the number of influencers and stance within a topic is increasing or decreasing.
By using this intelligence to identify trends as soon as they begin to develop, PR teams can assess the risk of content, driving efficiencies and increasing the quality of understanding conversations, perceptions, and intent.
They can get deeper and more complex insight into audience opinion to pre-empt stories before they potentially threaten brand reputation and they can do it quicker than manual analysis or relying solely on sentiment.

Every opinion counts
With user-generated content shared via social media accelerating, expectations on brands’ reactions to global events increasing along with the penalties for missteps or steps not taken, brands risk sleepwalking into a catastrophe without the correct media monitoring technology in place.
Whether it’s predicting the reaction to a campaign or determining an audience’s opinion regarding a new product launch, every opinion and its context counts. However, relying on automatic sentiment detection or hours of manual labour are no longer the only options for PR teams.
Stance analysis supports brands with enriched data points beyond what traditional sentiment analysis can offer. Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence can help PR teams save their clients time and money, reduce risk and create opportunities. Mass mentions can now be monitored intelligently at scale, and it’s essential for brands and agencies looking to deliver faster and more decisive action.
Sentiment alone is not reliable. But with artificial intelligence, PR teams will be unstoppable.