Vulnerability versus visibility: Why charities struggle to talk about challenges

In the charity and not-for-profit sector, visibility is often seen as a marker of success. In our industry, we talk about raising awareness, amplifying impact and being heard in an increasingly crowded landscape. But when organisations face genuine difficulty – funding shortfalls, contract losses, rising demands and operational pressure – visibility can suddenly feel like a risk rather than an asset.

There is an unspoken fear that being open about challenges will undermine trust. That honest communications will deter funders, weaken reputation or be interpreted as failure. As a result, many charities retreat into cautious messaging to soften the truth or stay silent altogether. From my experience, silence rarely protects organisations. More often, it isolates them.

The context for this hesitation is, of course, understandable. Over the last two years, in particular, we have seen widespread media coverage of financial instability across the voluntary sector. National news outlets have reported on charities closing services due to inflationary pressures and post-pandemic demand spikes. From household name organisations announcing restructuring programmes to local charities warning of imminent closure, the headlines have reinforced a sense of fragility across the sector. When stories focus on deficits and cutbacks, it is no wonder that it can feel safer to say less. No news is good news… right?

Solidarity or suspicion

Yet the same news cycle also demonstrates something important: when charities communicate vulnerability with clarity and purpose, communities often respond with solidarity rather than suspicion. 

Last August, I was part of the trustee board of Cambridge Community Arts when we made the incredibly difficult decision to close the charity after 11 years. It was not a sudden decision, nor was it taken lightly. Long before that moment, we were navigating many of the same pressures facing charities across the UK: financial insecurity and a widening gap between need and available resources.

As trustees, we did everything we could to keep the organisation going. And importantly, we chose to be open and transparent in our external communications. We spoke honestly about the challenges we were facing and the support needed to change the outcome. We believed (and still do) that transparency is a fundamental part of ethical charity leadership.

While those communications – and everything we did behind the scenes – did not save the charity, they did something else that matters deeply in the context of trust and reputation. They allowed us to lead with integrity. They enabled conversations rooted in reality rather than optimism alone. And, when the decision to close was made, it was understood in context. It wasn’t framed as failure, but as the outcome of a responsible, well-governed process.

A measured tone

Another powerful example of vulnerability done well can be seen in the recent communications from Arthur Rank Hospice in Cambridge. When the hospice announced devastating funding cuts that would have forced the closure of nine inpatient beds, it did not dilute the message. It clearly explained the scale of the shortfall, the impact on patient care and the urgency of the situation. The tone was measured and human rather than catastrophised or concealed. The result has been extraordinary. Local media covered the story widely, community leaders spoke out in support and residents rallied behind the hospice. Within weeks, a wave of fundraising and public backing helped secure enough immediate support to save the beds from closure. A follow-up announcement credited the community’s response as instrumental; proving that the hospice’s vulnerability didn’t erode trust but activated it. 

Importantly, this was strategic, values-led communication rather than a reactive social media plea. The hospice articulated what was happening, the impact it would have, why it mattered, and how people could help. It treated stakeholders as partners rather than a passive audience. 

One of the most difficult tensions charities face is that funders often look for confidence and stability, but trust is built on truth. Balancing those expectations requires more than goodwill; it needs strategic communications grounded in clarity and purpose.

Too often, vulnerability in charity communications is mistaken for weakness. When, in reality, if handled thoughtfully, it can strengthen credibility. Organisations that communicate openly and consistently tend to build deeper, more resilient relationships with funders, partners and communities, even during periods of challenge. It helps to signal accountability and shows that leaders understand the situation and are willing to take action and invite others into the solution. 

Overcoming challenges

Of course, transparency doesn’t mean panic or broadcasting internal anxieties or eroding morale. But it should instead focus on the challenge, why overcoming it matters, what steps the charity is taking to solve it and what support could make a difference. Charities shouldn’t be scared to share the data alongside the human impact because, in turn, it will acknowledge the uncertainty whilst demonstrating governance and control. 

From both my work in communications and my experience as a trustee, I’ve learned that visibility without honesty is fragile. It creates a polished surface that quickly cracks under pressure. Visibility rooted in transparency, by contrast, invites understanding. It creates space for dialogue, support and shared responsibility. And while not every charity can continue, every organisation deserves the chance to tell its story with dignity and clarity.

In a sector under increasing strain, charity communications should not be about protecting appearances; it should steward trust, especially when circumstances are difficult. Because sometimes, being visible isn’t about being seen at your best but being understood at your most vulnerable and giving others the opportunity to stand alongside you.

Sophie Baillie is associate director and head of client services at Conscious Communications.

Further reading

Guardian columnist and Beauty Banks co-founder Sali Hughes: 'Nobody loves PR professionals more than I do'

Well beh(ai)ved women seldom make history or get cut through in these noisy times

Five neurodiversity TV shows for Neurodiversity Celebration Week