I have curated a Flipboard magazine for 16 months with the super title: Social Business Design magazine – Purpose & policy, openness & agility, structure & culture, communication & trust. Organizing to create more value for all faster than otherwise.
Trips off the tongue.
The service dutifully informs me that of all the stuff I read I have considered 913 articles worthy of inclusion in my niche ‘publication’, attracting 73 followers and 670 viewers.
It’s not me. It’s you.
I enjoy sharing, but sharing is insufficient. You need to understand that curation is about community and shared knowledge. Yet there is no community.
Who are these followers and viewers? I’ve no idea… it seems I must carry on my altruistic curation absent social feedback. Can we comment on what we find? No. We can share and discuss the curated content with our other communities on other social platforms, but not with this specific group of people coalesced around Social Business Design Magazine. Quite weird. Makes Flipboard start to look like a step worth skipping.
But what about Flipboard as knowledge repository? Perhaps each of us can enjoy the utility of my Flipboard magazine in isolation.
But alas, no. For those unfamiliar with Flipboard you may find this quite odd, but there is no way to search back through the corpus I’ve assembled here. Zero. It really is incredibly frustrating. And whether intentional or otherwise, I can find no way to export the collection to a service or format that makes it searchable.
How odd to be told there are no results for “socioveillance” when I know for definite that this content is flipped to my Flipboard magazine.
So that’s it, we’re done. This is the last item of content I will curate to my Flipboard magazine. Just to let followers know. Because I’m sociable like that.
The post Why I’ve decided to stop curating a Flipboard magazine appeared first on Philip Sheldrake.